<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bing, Yahoo!, Google and the Ad Serving Internets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bryanhelmig.com/bing-yahoo-google-and-the-ad-serving-internets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bryanhelmig.com/bing-yahoo-google-and-the-ad-serving-internets/</link>
	<description>...and a digital brain freeze.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 10:40:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://bryanhelmig.com/bing-yahoo-google-and-the-ad-serving-internets/comment-page-1/#comment-647</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 07:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bryanhelmig.com/?p=180#comment-647</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve noticed that Bing and Yahoo are both much better at ranking my content rich celebrity fansites higher than all the cookie cutter celeb mega sites that have a lockdown on googles rankings. In terms of the searcher they would much rather find a full feature site on a topic then an empty shell on a subject that only ranked high due to PR and tons of backlinks, Google is going downhill and forgetting to check the content of some of their top ranking sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve noticed that Bing and Yahoo are both much better at ranking my content rich celebrity fansites higher than all the cookie cutter celeb mega sites that have a lockdown on googles rankings. In terms of the searcher they would much rather find a full feature site on a topic then an empty shell on a subject that only ranked high due to PR and tons of backlinks, Google is going downhill and forgetting to check the content of some of their top ranking sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yumi Vega</title>
		<link>http://bryanhelmig.com/bing-yahoo-google-and-the-ad-serving-internets/comment-page-1/#comment-472</link>
		<dc:creator>Yumi Vega</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 10:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bryanhelmig.com/?p=180#comment-472</guid>
		<description>i  am  using  both  Bing   and   Google  a nd i think both search engines give relevant search results. i would still prefer Google though, because it gives a little bit more relevant search results than Bing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i  am  using  both  Bing   and   Google  a nd i think both search engines give relevant search results. i would still prefer Google though, because it gives a little bit more relevant search results than Bing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy Sy</title>
		<link>http://bryanhelmig.com/bing-yahoo-google-and-the-ad-serving-internets/comment-page-1/#comment-439</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy Sy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 11:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bryanhelmig.com/?p=180#comment-439</guid>
		<description>i have been using the BING search engine for a couple of weeks. it seems to be as good as Google but for some reason i would still want to stick with Google search engine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have been using the BING search engine for a couple of weeks. it seems to be as good as Google but for some reason i would still want to stick with Google search engine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
